deviantART

 

BS?

Journal Entry: Sat Apr 26, 2008, 8:09 AM
  • Mood: Humor
Jocarra - Jen Philpot


You work a $9/hr job (that is, a dollar above minimum wage).

You have a new manager.

Schedules are posted at least a week or two in advance.

You properly scheduled time off a month and a half ago in order to accomodate an important and mandatory non-work event.

It is one of your days you booked off. You go into work to check your schedule ahead of time, and discover you are working TODAY.

You warn your supervisor that you may be a little late due to important non-work event, also today, but assure them you will be there.

You get in trouble, and are told it's YOUR responsibility to ensure that scheduling (the manager's job) is done correctly.

BS?

I think so.

* * *

Admittedly, I probably should have checked further ahead of time to ensure that my days off made it into the schedule, because the manager is new. However, is it MY responsibility as a just-above-minimum-wage-worker to routinely check that the manager's work (who gets paid the equivalent of 3-6 times more, depending) is done correctly?

I think that while I may have been able to prevent a scheduling conflict if I had been more attentive, it is not necessarily then MY responsibility - ie. it should not be MY fault because the MANAGER can't do his/her job properly.

A note of warning: don't work for Starbucks. They're a good company that tries to care about its employees, and they offer a lot of great benefits. However, they pull BS like this all the bloody time. It's YOUR responsibility to check up on your manager. It's YOUR responsibility to be a happy, cheerful person, even when you're not working (I actually got in trouble on my review for this one, too). It's YOUR responsibility to care about the company and be knowledgeable, even if you're not being paid for it.

I believe in doing my job, and doing it well. I even believe in sometimes doing thankless duties that are not necessarily part of my job description, that are not something I'm paid for. However, I also believe in not being taken advantage of, and not being EXPECTED to go above and beyond what I'm being paid for.

I should not be expected, as a $9/hr employee, to care as if I'm being paid $20-50/hr. I bloody HATE that.

I wouldn't mind so much if this BS wasn't so much an integral part of Starbucks and happening ALL THE TIME... but, well, what can I do other than quit?

End rant.



Commission Status

I am presently closed to commissions.
3/3 slots are full.
Commission Waitlist.
1 ~LiquidChaos - 0%, paid in full.
2 ~DiscipleofSpoon - 2%, advance not yet paid.
3 (empty)

Please refer to my commission FAQ for more information.


Art Status

Requests - Never
Trades - Unlikely
~cocowash Alnek - 100%
=Venator-Somniorum Hunters in the Snow - 10%
=Venator-Somniorum Shura char sheet - 0%
=Venator-Somniorum ACEO set - 33%
Collaborations - Unlikely
~Theglavwen Virgo - 90%
=Venator-Somniorum Maow... - 50%
Gifts
~Doran-Blackdawn - 45%
~Theglavwen Mo Grá - 50%


Prints/Tutorials

Prints




Tutorials

Fur Tutorial I
Fur Tutorial II
Graphite Tutorial
Star Tutorial
CG Tutorial
Wolf Walkthrough


Music




Galleries



Art Usage

:bulletblue: You may not USE, ALTER or REPOST my artwork for any reason without my permission.
:bulletblue: You may use my artwork for your wallpapers without asking.
:bulletblue: You may copy or reference my artwork IF you credit me AND link back to the original.
:bulletblue: You may use my tutorials without linking back to me.

Give credit where credit is due. Thank you.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 1 1 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 1 1

total BS! D:<

--
まい

"I haven't lost my mind! It's backed up on a disk somewhere!"
"Truly great things stand the test of time."

I am James McCloud in the ~F-Zero-club!
Sounds kind of like Tim Horton's (and I guess every other fast food restaurant out there). everybody hates working at tim's for a lot of the same reasons. one of my friends was ALWAYS working, she never seemed to have any time off, and when she did, she had to go look after her horse (who has numerous medical problems). she was never able to get homework done, she hated working there. it seems to be the same situation from all the people i know who work at tim horton's. so much for "flexible hours"

you shouldn't be expected to check up on the manager. i mean, he's the manager for a reason. he's supposed to be "managing" the the other employees and the restaurant, not the other way around. what's the point of having a manager at all if all of his subordinates have to check up on him constantly to make sure he's doing his job right?
In my most recent 'career' I routinely had to argue with managers and HR every time I had a review. I moved around from job to job (I promoted very quickly and routinely) so often that I generally only had a particular manager for six to eight months.

The result seemed to be that every time I had a review, my current manager would rate me as 'meets expectations' because they "hadn't been my manager long enough to get to know me."

So every year for nearly ten years I had to go to HR and say that it was my manager's responsibility to go speak to my previous managers and figure out who and what they were dealing with.

Every time I fought it, I won, but the sad story is that they all had to be told how to do their jobs, by their employee. If I hadn't been watching them like I was then I wouldn't have been able to get as far as I did in as short of a time as I had.

It's just sad how much you have to police people in order to make them do their jobs the way they should be doing them anyway. It's a pretty sad state of affairs.

--
Please check out my new novel The First Key of Kalijor.
"To thine own self be true, and thou canst not then be false to anyone."
~William Shakespeare~
"you shouldn't be expected to check up on the manager. i mean, he's the manager for a reason. he's supposed to be "managing" the the other employees and the restaurant, not the other way around. what's the point of having a manager at all if all of his subordinates have to check up on him constantly to make sure he's doing his job right?"

Exactly. However, the problem is that the manager is NEW. Realistically, we should forgive when mistakes are made and try to do what we can to prevent them, but I don't think we should be MADE RESPONSIBLE for the manager's jobs, just because the manager is new. Being considerate is fine. I was trying to be considerate by checking ahead of time (in my mind), but got in trouble because it wasn't good enough, not soon enough to correct the mistake. But it wasn't MY mistake. So why should I be responsible?

Starbucks says because we should all work and care about work as if we're managers... except only paid minimum wage. :roll:

--
~Jen Philpot
De lvce obscvritateqve et omnibvs qvae vltra latent...
Potestisne videre?

I do well on my reviews, except the manager always comes up with reasons not to give me the bigger promotion.

One of them was, "When you're working, you put up excellent positive attitude and energy. However, you tend to be depressed or cranky when you're no longer working."

EXCUSE ME for not being happy all the time. When I'm being paid, sure, I'll be a good customer service person and smile and be friendly. When I'm not being paid, I'll feel sad if I did poorly on an exam, or frustrated when I just had a fight with my mother, or angry if something really unjust happened, or worried if there's a big final looming. But, apparently I'm not allowed to feel that way, and most definitely not allowed to SHOW it.

Bullshit. You're not paying me when I'm not working... but they can still judge me whether I'm working or not :b

The other one was, "Fellow employees/the management team doesn't believe you when you call in sick." Excuse me? I explain that I have IBS, which tends to make me sick when very stressed, and to which there is no real cure. I also explain that certain private family events on the rare occasion prevent me from being able to go to work. I call in sick or whatever, and always give 8+ hours notice. I've also offered to bring in notes from my mom/doctor/whatever. But that's not good enough - people choose to not believe me, and so it's for some reason my fault and I should be paid less for it?

The excuse was that it put me in bad repor with the team, decreasing efficiency. It's perception that matters, not reality. (We actually had this discussion in a store meeting :roll: - "what really happens is beside the point") I know very well what perception can do, but it's not a bloody excuse to CHOOSE whatever the hell you want because it's convenient and easier that way.

--
~Jen Philpot
De lvce obscvritateqve et omnibvs qvae vltra latent...
Potestisne videre?

Personally I've never had a job, but thanks for the tip at not working for starbucks. I'll keep that in mind. But yes, that's total bullshit that you have to go above and beyond the call of duty just to make sure the manager that's paid a much higher amount of money than you does their job. It shouldn't be your job to make sure the manager's not being an idiot, it's their job.

--
The Monument...
The Teddy Bear...
Well, don't work at Starbucks if you don't like being punished for not doing MORE than what you're SUPPOSED to do. They have lots of great benefits, and it's a pretty good atmosphere to work in... but the expectations are stupid (especially given it's only a minimum wage job), and the customers are pretty ridiculous - no one is snottier than a SB customer >:E

"it's their job" Exactly. Pay me like a manager, and I'll care like one, and work like one. Until then...

--
~Jen Philpot
De lvce obscvritateqve et omnibvs qvae vltra latent...
Potestisne videre?

Wow...Maybe you should look for another job on the side and quit Starbucks once you've sealed another job...

But I dunno ^^; I'm still at school and living at home, don't mind me...

Thanks for the tip, too! ^_^

--
Commissions open for those interested. Note me!
Bleh. That sucks. I worked at Walmart for a short time, and one of my favorites was when they'd actually Change the schedule, but not notify anyone. Seriously. Like, you would write down the schedule, but then be expected to go back in and confirm that "yes, it's still the same", otherwise it's your fault for not showing up to work. >.o say wha?......(and that was at $7.70 an hour. (but yeahyeah, I know, US and Canada prices and such are different! :lol: ))
Blargh.. Target used to do that to me all the time... And it was put on my record thing that I missed days without calling in. Ummm... No. Eh oh well. I got paid 8.00 an hour there, now that I'm working at Subway I started at 7.50 an hour. The manager was afraid I'd quit and leave them so she gave me a dollar raise.

But anywho, to the OP; Yea that's messed up.

--
Wolf-coon goodness!

Commission Specials

PORTRAIT COMMISSION SPECIAL
head/face close-up in a realistic/semi-realistic style
300x300 = $30, 500x500 = $50, 800x800 = $80

BUST COMMISSION SPECIAL
upper chest/head & simple/minimal background in a realistic/semi-realistic style
300x300 = $35, 500x500 = $55, 800x800 = $85

BADGE COMMISSION SPECIAL
portrait or bust & background & name in a realistic/semi-realistic style
600x450 = $60, 800x600 = $80

For those interested in entering my contest, how much more time would you like to get your entries in?

23%
68 deviants said I'd like to enter, but I'm too lazy and probably won't get around to it no matter the cut-off date.
22%
67 deviants said I don't have time for contests.
14%
43 deviants said I plan on entering - I'd like until the end of August.
14%
43 deviants said I'd like to enter, but I doubt I'll win (even though there are three prizes and only four entries so far) so I won't bother.
12%
37 deviants said I don't like or am not interested in contests.
8%
24 deviants said I plan on entering - I need longer than the end of August, please!
5%
16 deviants said I plan on entering - I don't need longer than the end of July.

Shoutbox

=jocarra:iconjocarra:
:heart:
Mon Jul 13, 2009, 12:08 PM
~fiannaValkyrie:iconfiannaValkyrie:
So about that vacation contest? [link]
Mon Jul 13, 2009, 2:03 AM
~NIKON-AJ:iconNIKON-AJ:
Cookie Cookie
Sun Jun 28, 2009, 7:31 PM
=jocarra:iconjocarra:
We're wimps :c
Sat May 30, 2009, 9:51 PM
~AnanziP1:iconAnanziP1:
We're south-coasters, none of us can handle anything beyond 25C (or below 0C for that matter)
Sat May 30, 2009, 9:24 PM
=jocarra:iconjocarra:
Phew, it's getting bloody hot around here... Then again, I can't stand any temperature hotter than 25C, it seems :|
Fri May 29, 2009, 7:15 PM
~Swaldy:iconSwaldy:
Your art is just amazing
Fri May 29, 2009, 2:14 AM
~hikari-no-devil:iconhikari-no-devil:
Happy Birthday !
Thu Apr 23, 2009, 2:24 AM
~kettish:iconkettish:
welcome home jormie! 8D
Wed Apr 22, 2009, 11:59 PM
~NIKON-AJ:iconNIKON-AJ:
Happy Birthday
Wed Apr 22, 2009, 9:27 PM
~NIKON-AJ:iconNIKON-AJ:
Hi Jen Enjoy the Sunshine of Today
Wed Mar 11, 2009, 7:58 AM
=jocarra:iconjocarra:
I dunno, I think wolves are better at being wolves than they are at being human :V
Sun Mar 1, 2009, 4:46 AM
~Wolf-Shadow77:iconWolf-Shadow77:
I hope you cope with this better than i coped with my dog's death c':>
Sat Feb 21, 2009, 8:09 PM
*Theanoula:iconTheanoula:
wolves are the best humans....
Wed Feb 11, 2009, 11:31 PM
~Siochanna:iconSiochanna:
Human interference has made the current mass extinction a rival for any of the "big five," and in this one human hunting has played a role. We may choose to see ourselves as a regulating influence, but given our track record I doubt such an ego is warran
Fri Jan 23, 2009, 4:46 PM
~Siochanna:iconSiochanna:
The species of the world are in for a lot of sudden changes, and many of them won't live through the night. Sudden changes are hardest on species that inheret their survival mechanisms, but the current die-off will affect even humans.
Fri Jan 23, 2009, 4:31 PM
~Siochanna:iconSiochanna:
Consider this. For the fox population to maintain itself, it had to increasze its birthrate to compensate for the human predation. Now, a predator has been removed and so the foxes are now adjusting, painfully of course, to the sudden change. The speci
Fri Jan 23, 2009, 4:29 PM
=jocarra:iconjocarra:
That's not always the case, otherwise no species would have ever gone extinct in the past.
Tue Jan 20, 2009, 10:37 PM
~lenatheloser:iconlenatheloser:
The population will even itself out. It always does and always will, unless human interference prevents that.
Tue Jan 20, 2009, 1:13 PM
=jocarra:iconjocarra:
I was actually thinking of posting the hard data behind how it actually works.
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 10:11 PM

Site Map